Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
Tag

citizen science

September 18, 2017

research links w 37 -17

In Research Roundup
3 Min Read
18September

I’m going to start prioritizing brevity, leaving out some of the absurdity and academic opps, let me know if you miss anything. Findings How to improve the quality of crowdsourced citizen science data? Technical measures help, but only when accompanied by instructions, according to an empirical study of four cases. Meanwhile, open data on public safety and transportation are the most...

Read on
January 31, 2017

research links w 4/17

In Research Roundup
5 Min Read
31January

Papers & Findings The world is ending. The 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index finds links between corruption and inequality, and notes falling scores for countries around the world. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index is titled Revenge of the “deplorables”, and notes a worsening of the worldwide “democratic recession” in 2016. Civic techs. What are...

Read on
Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
This is a blog about how the civic tech and accountability field measures its work and its impact. It’s based on a critical perspective, but tries to be more productive than conference snark. It’s an effort to highlight how much work is being done in silos across the academic-NGO divide, to de-mystify important methods and findings, and to call out research that is sloppy or unhelpful.

Tags

africa anti-corruption big data brazil China civic engagement collaboration comparative indices corruption crowdsourcing development e-government elections europe facebook fake news field comment FOIA gender ghana health human rights impact India intermediaries Kenya latin america literature review methods OGP open data participation participatory budgeting procurement protest RCTs social media spain survey transparency trust twitter uganda US visualization