Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
Tag

samples

October 13, 2016

Panel weights and voice for the voiceless (lessons from Uncle Sam’s Rock-Bottom Yankee Doodle Suicide Pact 2016)

In methods, Random Snark, Uncategorized
2 Min Read
13October

So not even MethodicalSnark can resist the US presidential elections (as christened by John Oliver). New York Times ran a piece this week entitled How One 19-Year-Old Illinois Man Is Distorting National Polling Averages. Our Trump-supporting friend in Illinois is a surprisingly big part of the reason. In some polls, he’s weighted as much as 30 times more than the average respondent, and as much...

Read on
Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
This is a blog about how the civic tech and accountability field measures its work and its impact. It’s based on a critical perspective, but tries to be more productive than conference snark. It’s an effort to highlight how much work is being done in silos across the academic-NGO divide, to de-mystify important methods and findings, and to call out research that is sloppy or unhelpful.

Tags

africa anti-corruption big data brazil China civic engagement collaboration comparative indices corruption crowdsourcing development e-government elections europe facebook fake news field comment FOIA gender ghana health human rights impact India intermediaries Kenya latin america literature review methods OGP open data participation participatory budgeting procurement protest RCTs social media spain survey transparency trust twitter uganda US visualization