Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
Tag

psychology

October 10, 2016

research links w40

In Research Roundup
4 Min Read
10October

Papers / Findings Squeaky wheels get the grease.  Analysis of policy crowdsourcing for urban planning in California uses natural language processing to show that (1) whether or not citizen contributions are included in policy depended on their “volume and tone,” (2) that the contributing crowd was more representative of the community than elected representatives contributions, and (3)...

Read on
October 3, 2016

Research Links w 39

In Research Roundup
3 Min Read
03October

Papers and Findings Nordic Open Access to Research Data. A new research paper reiterates important conditions for effective open access, and offers 3 recommendations for Nordic research communities that take advantage of their countries’ size and position. A psychology study in Zimbabwe suggests that for political activism in repressive political contexts, psychological resilience in the...

Read on
Methodical Snark critical reflections on how we measure and assess civic tech
This is a blog about how the civic tech and accountability field measures its work and its impact. It’s based on a critical perspective, but tries to be more productive than conference snark. It’s an effort to highlight how much work is being done in silos across the academic-NGO divide, to de-mystify important methods and findings, and to call out research that is sloppy or unhelpful.

Tags

africa anti-corruption big data brazil China civic engagement collaboration comparative indices corruption crowdsourcing development e-government elections europe facebook fake news field comment FOIA gender ghana health human rights impact India intermediaries Kenya latin america literature review methods OGP open data participation participatory budgeting procurement protest RCTs social media spain survey transparency trust twitter uganda US visualization